Portfolios

• Master doc ind
• element that is worthwhile - archiving of project 
• consider photos - taking photography serious 
• every project has to be to a high standard
• commission.studio
• if a final outcome is weak, go back, fix or extend it 
• your portfolio is only as good as your weakest project 
• give context
• be honest about level of involvement in project
• choice of type - personal branding
• less is more - images tell the story 
• include contact details - phone no, email...
• sort your master doc into categories 
• try to show something new/different in each project 
• establish a consistent tone of voice
• back up as you go
• work with photography students 
• documentation of work is even more important than the work itself 
• export at less than 4mb
• pick 4/5 projects to clients
• a week follow up
• SNASK - based in Stockholm, Sweden - internship scheme 

Which projects to get rid of

Only high standard ones 

need to focus on documentation and photography in process
re print things - higher standard or re design in a day
client briefs or intitiated, freelance - shows more drive, all rounder
mix of outcomes and sectors
only show a couple of main ones
a range of print, scanned, digital etc - playful
find a photographer with a conceptual thinking