Graphic Design for the real world ?
Visual communication’s potential in design activism and design for social change
What is the main argument of the article?
The approach aims to be activist by designers but doesn't necessarily use the right approach - not always executed. Persuasive activism (mimics corporate strategy - not giving positive change) and visual communication as information (gives the user more control to interpret)
What is the main theoretical framework for the article?
social theory - social change
What types of design do they critique?
advertising (campaigns)
What might you as a designer take from this?
Visual communication’s potential in design activism and design for social change
what approach from this - a model - approving how graphic design works - how can empower
The graphic thing
what is thingness as it relates to graphic design?
graphic design invades the meaning process
what is the main argument? What can graphic designers take from the research?
Things are things as we give them meaning
Can you identify a coherent theoretical framework in the article?
too elaborate - talking about scientific etc etc
good in advertising - breaking the rules - adopting the thingness approach
categorises in perception .....
The future of print design relies on interaction
How does this research article differ from the previous two?
not a question - informative, project based on research and critical
What is the main aim or argument of the research?
make print more interactive
Does the author utilise a theoretical framework?
No comments:
Post a Comment