source : (logodesignlove, 2012).
No sooner was the Michelin Man born when he began to play a major role for the company: it was he who presented the products and advised and assisted motorists, becoming the brand’s worldwide ambassador.
No sooner was the Michelin Man born when he began to play a major role for the company: it was he who presented the products and advised and assisted motorists, becoming the brand’s worldwide ambassador.
But the Michelin Man learned to change with the times. In
the 1920s he discarded his pince-nez eyeglasses, and also gave up his cigar (at
the dawn of the motor age these appendages had helped him appeal to the very
small, wealthy section of society that had the power to buy a car)
Compared to the cuddly mascot that contemporary audiences
are accustomed to, early iterations of the Michelin Man come as something of a
surprise.
The aim of all advertising
is first to create recognition for a brand, and then, ideally, affection and
loyalty. This can be achieved in a multitude of ways, but one of the best
examples can be found in a symbol that is now 116 years old: the Michelin Man,
or Bibendum, as he was formally known.
He is an unusual figure in
logo design. A light-hearted, jolly character, the Michelin Man is more of a
mascot for the brand, albeit a rather strange one constructed solely from
tires. In this he is very much a product of his time, as design historian and
curator Alain Weill suggests: “Using specific characters was the trend–the
little girl for Menier, the Pierrot for Cointreau, and so on. The great thing
with the chubby little man made out of tires is that he could be represented in
various situations; the different possible versions is my favorite thing about
him.”
From the 1930s onwards, Michelin made increasingly less use
of outside artists. As a result, images of the Michelin Man became more
standardised, although there were country-specific variants. Adapting to the
evolution of tyres, his rings became thicker and the character dropped his
wealthy image to move closer to a broader customer base.
The look of the branding mascot had
changed from the 1930’s onwards as his ‘rings became thicker and the character dropped
his wealthy image to move closer to a broader customer base’ (logodesignlove,
2012).
The re design of the mascot has
enabled the mascot to stay relevant, due to
Paola Antonelli, senior curator in the department of
architecture and design at The Museum of Modern Art and notable Bibendum fan,
points out that wide-ranging identity systems are today becoming the norm,
instead of the single logo or mascot. “At that time, you used to have the
newspaper, you had your garage, and you had packaging,” she says. “In a way, it
was a set of applications that could be contained in a manual. Now, it’s much
more complicated because the mediums are so dynamic and diverse.” That Bibendum
is still with us in the 21st century, happily drinking up those
obstacles–though no longer shouting about doing so–is testament to the rewards
of sticking with a brilliant idea.
No comments:
Post a Comment